China has imposed sanctions on a US research firm, Kharon, which is known for its extensive reporting on alleged human rights violations in Xinjiang, a region in the northwest of the country. The announcement, made late on Tuesday, stated that Kharon and its two principal analysts are now denied entry into China. The firm has been actively investigating and reporting on accusations that the Chinese government is infringing on the human rights of Uighurs and other Muslim minority groups. This move underscores the escalating tensions between China and entities that scrutinize its domestic policies.
China Sanctions on US Research Firm and Analysts
On December 27, China announced a ban on Kharon, a US research firm, and two analysts, Edmund Xu and Nicole Morgret, who have reported extensively on alleged human rights abuses against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in Xinjiang. Mao Ning, a spokesperson for the Foreign Ministry, stated that these individuals and the firm would be prohibited from entering China, and any assets or property they possess in China would be seized. Chinese organizations and individuals are also forbidden from transacting or cooperating with them.
US Government Report
The US government annually publishes a report on human rights in Xinjiang, identifying individuals, including officials from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), who are implicated in human rights abuses against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities. The report outlines various abuses, including torture, inhumane treatment, prolonged detention without trial, forced disappearances, and other severe violations of basic human rights. In 2021, the report was expanded to include serious human rights abuses related to forced labor. The US government concluded in 2021 that since at least 2017, PRC authorities have committed genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other minority groups in Xinjiang. This report is submitted to several committees of the US Congress for review and action.
Mao explained that these sanctions were a response to an annual US government report on human rights in Xinjiang. Uyghurs and other native groups in the region, who share cultural, linguistic, and religious ties with Central Asian communities, have long opposed the Chinese Communist Party’s attempts to assimilate them into the majority Han ethnic group.
Industrialization of Xinjiang and Denial of Allegations
In a paper published in June 2022, Morgret stated that the Chinese government’s drive to industrialize the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) has led to increased corporations establishing manufacturing operations there. This state-controlled industrial policy is a key instrument in the government’s efforts to forcibly assimilate Uyghurs and other Turkic peoples through a coerced labor regime. China has consistently denied these allegations, asserting that the extensive network of prison-like facilities, which have housed hundreds of thousands of Muslim citizens, were designed solely to eliminate violent, extremist tendencies and provide job skills.
Escalating Tensions and Retaliatory Actions
Mao accused the United States of spreading false stories about Xinjiang and unlawfully sanctioning Chinese officials and companies over so-called human rights issues. He warned that if the United States does not change its course, China will not hesitate to retaliate.
The US has taken a firm stance against China and the semi-autonomous city of Hong Kong by imposing visa bans and a variety of other sanctions on numerous officials. Washington halted imports from the region over forced labor concerns. Activists are calling for a boycott of Beijing’s Winter Olympics. China denies abuses and advocates for boycotts of foreign brands.
This includes China’s former defense minister, whose unexplained disappearance has raised eyebrows. Since China enacted a comprehensive national security law in response to massive anti-government protests in 2019, Hong Kong’s government has severely curtailed freedom of speech and democracy. Neither Xu nor Morgret could be reached for comment immediately, and it remains unclear what if any, connection they have with the US government.
Implication of the Sanctions
Comments 1